header-logo header-logo

15 September 2011 / Eleanor Kelly
Issue: 7481 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Shareholders say no

Eleanor Kelly charts the rise of opposition to directors’ remuneration

Many company directors will have noted with a mixture of interest and trepidation the increase in the level of discontent over the issue of directors’ remuneration at many listed company annual general meetings this year.

PIRC report

The rise in shareholder opposition to directors’ pay was highlighted in a report published by shareholder advisory group Pensions Investment Research Consultants Ltd (PIRC) on voting trends across 287 companies in the first six months of 2011.

This revealed that in the year to the end of June 2011, the average vote against the directors’ remuneration report was 6.1%, and average abstentions were 3.14%. This reflects a 0.5% rise in opposition compared to the first six months of 2010 and a 2.8% rise since 2008. PIRC also reported that in 2008, 82.6% of reports were approved with less than 5% of shareholders voting against the resolution, compared to only 66% this year.

Cable & Wireless

One of most publicised cases of shareholder revolt against directors’ pay this year was at the Cable & Wireless

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll