header-logo header-logo

02 May 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SFO funding

Concerns over Serious Fraud Office's dwindling budget

Extra money gained by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) from successful investigations last year only just makes up for cuts in its budget, law firm Pinsent Masons has warned.

Income from the SFO’s asset recovery scheme rose from £4.1m to £6.6m last year. However, its total operating budget was cut by £1.2m to £38.7m, and between 2008/09 and last year, its budget has fallen by £16m. Its budget is forecast to fall to £33.3m in 2014/15.

Barry Vitou, partner at Pinsent Masons, says: “The Treasury has agreed in principle to provide ad hoc funding when necessary for big cases. While ad-hoc funding is welcomed, SFO funding must be consistent and sufficient to enable it to plan ahead with confidence. The SFO must avoid falling into the trap of living hand to mouth and avoid repeating history where there has been an element of penny wise, pound foolish.”
 

Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll