header-logo header-logo

02 May 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SFO funding

Concerns over Serious Fraud Office's dwindling budget

Extra money gained by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) from successful investigations last year only just makes up for cuts in its budget, law firm Pinsent Masons has warned.

Income from the SFO’s asset recovery scheme rose from £4.1m to £6.6m last year. However, its total operating budget was cut by £1.2m to £38.7m, and between 2008/09 and last year, its budget has fallen by £16m. Its budget is forecast to fall to £33.3m in 2014/15.

Barry Vitou, partner at Pinsent Masons, says: “The Treasury has agreed in principle to provide ad hoc funding when necessary for big cases. While ad-hoc funding is welcomed, SFO funding must be consistent and sufficient to enable it to plan ahead with confidence. The SFO must avoid falling into the trap of living hand to mouth and avoid repeating history where there has been an element of penny wise, pound foolish.”
 

Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll