header-logo header-logo

27 November 2014 / Clive Thomas
Issue: 7632 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Setting limits

thomas

New guidance has been issued on the use of ex parte orders, as Clive Thomas explains

In cases of domestic abuse the court, under Pt IV of the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996), has the power to make occupation and non-molestation injunctions. Such orders can also be made ex parte should the court consider it “just and convenient to do so” (s 45). When determining whether or not to make an ex parte occupation or non-molestation order, the court is to have regard to all the circumstances, including whether:

  1. there is any risk of significant harm to the applicant or a relevant child, attributable to conduct of the respondent, if the order is not made immediately;
  2. it is likely that the applicant will be deterred or prevented from pursuing the application if an order is not made immediately; and
  3. there is reason to believe that the respondent is aware of the proceedings but is deliberately evading service and that the applicant or a relevant child will be seriously prejudiced by the delay involved.

In addition, s 45(3) provides that “if the court makes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll