header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , International , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Separation of church & state

225826
How has a phrase that appears nowhere in the supreme law of the US managed to become part of it? Athelstane Aamodt considers the history

Of all of the phrases connected with the Constitution of the United States, the only phrase more famous than ‘the right of the people to keep and bear Arms’ must be ‘separation of church and state’. It has informed debates about the Establishment Clause found in the First Amendment for years. The American Constitution is also clear that ‘no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States’ (Article VI, Clause 3).

This all seems clear. Religion has no role to play in government in America. However, it becomes rather less clear when you realise that the phrase ‘separation of church and state’ does not appear anywhere in the Constitution at all. How, then, has a phrase that forms no part of the supreme law of the US managed to become part of it?

The garden & the wilderness

Many phrases with which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll