header-logo header-logo

05 January 2018 / Julian Savulescu , Charles Foster
Issue: 7775 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Separated at birth?

nlj_7775_foster

Should pregnant mothers owe a duty to their unborn children? Charles Foster & Julian Savulescu review the legal & ethical issues

  • The autonomy rights of pregnant mothers are hugely important, but should not always prevail over the rights of future children not to be injured by the acts or defaults of their mothers
  • Legislation is needed to correct the imbalance between these rights

Suppose that a woman is pregnant. She drinks a lot of alcohol, knowing that it is likely to harm her foetus. Can or should the law do anything—either during or after the pregnancy?

The mother’s position

ECHR arguments

The woman has, prima facie, a right to do what she wants with her own body. That is a right enshrined in that most elastic of the Articles of the ECHR: Article 8. Article 8 is, of course, not an absolute right: the right conferred by Article 8(1) is subject to the wider societal considerations of 8(2), the provisions of which read: ‘There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll