header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Separate appeals for bid rigging case

The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has said it will deal with the multiple appeals in the complex UK construction bid rigging case separately, and without making any preliminary rulings on common points of principle.

The case involves more than 100 construction firms and has posed a logistics puzzle for the CAT. Some 25 appeals on varying points will now be heard over a three-week period in late-June and July. In September 2009, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) imposed fines totalling £129.2m on 103 construction firms found to have colluded with competitors to artificially inflate prices.

Suzanne Rab, antitrust and competition Counsel at Hogan & Hartson, said: “The CAT’s decision to deal with the appeals in the UK construction bid rigging case separately, rather than collectively, has stretched the CAT procedures and logistics handling. With 25 appeals in all on varying points, some appeals contesting penalty and others challenging liability, the CAT certainly has its hands full but has committed to deal with the cases in an expeditious and fair way.”

Issue: 7403 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll