header-logo header-logo

24 November 2021
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sentencing weapons importers

Gun smugglers are to be targeted by a specific sentencing guideline, effective from 1 January 2022

The Sentencing Council developed the guideline, for adult offenders convicted of importing prohibited or restricted firearms in England and Wales, following requests from the National Crime Agency and the Crown Prosecution Service, and feedback from judges. Such offences are not frequently prosecuted―about 40 offenders were sentenced in 2020―but can be serious and complex. The Sentencing Council said the guideline would help courts take a consistent approach to sentencing offences they do not routinely see.

The sentences imposed, ranging from a fine to 28 years in prison, will be dependent on various factors, including type of firearm, role of the offender and scale and nature of the importation. The most serious cases involving lethal weapons will be sentenced in the Crown court. Less serious cases, typically involving importation of a stun gun with no criminal intent, may be sentenced in magistrates’ courts.

Sentencing Council member Mrs Justice Maura McGowan said: ‘Firearms offences are treated seriously; the more firearms there are in circulation, the greater the risk of death or serious injury.

‘The new guideline will ensure courts take a consistent approach to sentencing often complex firearms importation offences and will make the sentencing process more transparent and easier to understand for victims, witnesses, defendants and the public.’

The guideline covers importation of firearms and ammunition under two offences: improper importation of goods and fraudulent evasion of prohibition/restriction, and will be added to a suite of eight existing guidelines for other firearms offences that came into force on 1 January 2021.

Respondents to the Sentencing Council’s consultation on the proposed guideline, Firearms importation guideline, which closed in September, asked for more clarity on dealing with weapons that have been adapted or modified, and on interpreting the term ‘organised criminal group’ when categorising harm. 

Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll