header-logo header-logo

24 November 2021
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sentencing weapons importers

Gun smugglers are to be targeted by a specific sentencing guideline, effective from 1 January 2022

The Sentencing Council developed the guideline, for adult offenders convicted of importing prohibited or restricted firearms in England and Wales, following requests from the National Crime Agency and the Crown Prosecution Service, and feedback from judges. Such offences are not frequently prosecuted―about 40 offenders were sentenced in 2020―but can be serious and complex. The Sentencing Council said the guideline would help courts take a consistent approach to sentencing offences they do not routinely see.

The sentences imposed, ranging from a fine to 28 years in prison, will be dependent on various factors, including type of firearm, role of the offender and scale and nature of the importation. The most serious cases involving lethal weapons will be sentenced in the Crown court. Less serious cases, typically involving importation of a stun gun with no criminal intent, may be sentenced in magistrates’ courts.

Sentencing Council member Mrs Justice Maura McGowan said: ‘Firearms offences are treated seriously; the more firearms there are in circulation, the greater the risk of death or serious injury.

‘The new guideline will ensure courts take a consistent approach to sentencing often complex firearms importation offences and will make the sentencing process more transparent and easier to understand for victims, witnesses, defendants and the public.’

The guideline covers importation of firearms and ammunition under two offences: improper importation of goods and fraudulent evasion of prohibition/restriction, and will be added to a suite of eight existing guidelines for other firearms offences that came into force on 1 January 2021.

Respondents to the Sentencing Council’s consultation on the proposed guideline, Firearms importation guideline, which closed in September, asked for more clarity on dealing with weapons that have been adapted or modified, and on interpreting the term ‘organised criminal group’ when categorising harm. 

Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll