header-logo header-logo

21 February 2024
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Sentencing levels proposed for aggravated car theft

Draft sentencing guidelines have been published for motoring offences committed while joy-riding or behind the wheel of a stolen car

The Sentencing Council issued six draft guidelines this week, including four aggravated vehicle taking offences, which are covered by the Theft Act 1968, covering situations in which offenders driving a stolen vehicle or a vehicle taken without permission go on to drive dangerously or cause death, injury or damage to property.

The proposed draft would set a guideline for the first time for sentencing the offence in the Crown Court and replace the current magistrates’ court guidelines, which apply a maximum of two years’ custody for dangerous driving or 14 years if death results. The Crown Court heard the majority (76%) of around 250 adult offenders sentenced in 2022 for aggravated vehicle taking involving dangerous driving.

The draft guideline sets out harm, culpability and aggravating factors—such as vehicle taken as part of a burglary, damage done to an emergency vehicle, failure to stop, or having a child present in the car—as well as sentence levels. It proposes up to two years in prison, with a starting point of one year six months for offences causing the most serious harm, and low-level community orders for the least serious.

Where less than £5,000 damage is caused, the offence will be summary-only with a maximum penalty of six months in prison.

Where the offence causes death, the proposed minimum penalty is 12 months and maximum 14 years’ custody. In this situation, however, the suspected offender is usually charged with causing death by dangerous driving.

Sentencing Council member Judge Simon Drew KC said: ‘Drivers who commit motoring offences that result in death, injury or damage to property in vehicles they do not have permission to drive, can cause anguish and inconvenience both to the vehicle owner and to victims affected by their driving.’

The Council issued a further two draft guidelines this week, on vehicle registration fraud such as forging, altering or fraudulently using number plates, and an overarching guideline for driver disqualification, including principles to follow when imposing a disqualification.

Respond to the consultation by 22 May.

Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll