header-logo header-logo

26 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sentencing guidelines revised for assault

‘Spitting or coughing’ and ‘disease transmission’ would count as aggravating factors when sentencing for assault, under revised draft sentencing guidelines for assault offences

The Sentencing Council published revised draft guidelines last week for seven assault offences, including common assault, attempted murder and assaulting an emergency worker. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the draft guidelines class ‘intention to cause fear of serious harm, including disease transmission’ as a new high-culpability factor, while ‘spitting or coughing’ is an aggravating factor.

Sentencing Council spokesperson, Mr Justice Julian Goose, said: ‘Assault offences can be very personal crimes. It is important that sentences should be appropriate and proportionate, and reflect the harm caused to victims.

‘When in force, they will provide protection in the years ahead for the public and the people who serve them by providing public services or as emergency workers.’

The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 introduced a higher statutory maximum sentence of 12 months for offences of common assault against people specified as emergency workers.

The guidance for attempted murder has been revised to reflect changes to legislation where weapons are taken to the scene. The main thrust of the revisions is change to the way the seriousness of assault offences is assessed―the culpability and harm factors are more specific, and there is a greater number of offence categories and sentence starting points and ranges.

Judges, magistrates, lawyers and members of the public are invited to respond to the consultation by 15 September 2020. The guidelines are expected to come into force next year.

The consultation, ‘Assault offences consultation’, is available at: www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/consultations/assault-offences-consultation.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll