header-logo header-logo

14 March 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

SENTENCING

Richards v National Probation Service [2007] All ER (D) 454 (Nov)

The offender was subject to a suspended sentence order (under CJA 2003, s 189) which imposed an obligation to undertake unpaid work. The conditions included a requirement to provide documentary evidence explaining any failure to perform unpaid work.

HELD In the context of community punishments, a responsible officer is entitled to set conditions that require the offender to inform the officer in advance if he knows he cannot keep an appointment to do unpaid work. This falls within the words “keep in touch” in CJA 2003, s 220(1)(a).

The officer may require that information to be in writing and to be supported by evidence from a third party. It is permissible for the conditions to provide that the officer may relax that requirement in the circumstances of a given case, so that the information is to be provided within a short period thereafter.

However, s 220 cannot be read as enabling the responsible officer to request the information ex post facto unless the request is to provide the information in advance and a concession is then made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll