header-logo header-logo

14 March 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

SENTENCING

Richards v National Probation Service [2007] All ER (D) 454 (Nov)

The offender was subject to a suspended sentence order (under CJA 2003, s 189) which imposed an obligation to undertake unpaid work. The conditions included a requirement to provide documentary evidence explaining any failure to perform unpaid work.

HELD In the context of community punishments, a responsible officer is entitled to set conditions that require the offender to inform the officer in advance if he knows he cannot keep an appointment to do unpaid work. This falls within the words “keep in touch” in CJA 2003, s 220(1)(a).

The officer may require that information to be in writing and to be supported by evidence from a third party. It is permissible for the conditions to provide that the officer may relax that requirement in the circumstances of a given case, so that the information is to be provided within a short period thereafter.

However, s 220 cannot be read as enabling the responsible officer to request the information ex post facto unless the request is to provide the information in advance and a concession is then made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll