header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

SENTENCING

R v Reynolds [2007] EWCA Crim 538, [2007] All ER (D) 139 (Mar)

The Court of Appeal summarised the dangerous offender provisions in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003):

(i) The first question is whether the offence is a specified offence; the second is whether it is a serious offence.

(ii) If it is a specified offence, whether serious or not, the court must determine whether the defendant meets the criteria of
dangerousness.

(iii) If the criteria of dangerousness are met and the defendant is aged 18 or over:

(a) where the offence is a serious offence, he must be sentenced to an indeterminate sentence under s 225; or
(b) otherwise he must be sentenced to an extended sentence under s 227.
(iv) If the criteria of dangerousness are met, and the offender is under 18:
(a) if the offence is a serious offence and an offence to which he would be liable to a sentence of detention for life under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (PCC(S)A 2000),
s 91, and it justifies—together with any associated offence—detention for life, he must be sentenced to detention

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll