header-logo header-logo

04 April 2012 / Andrea Ward , Robert Jones
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Sent using MY iPad

Robert Jones & Andrea Ward examine the risks of the BYOD trend

BYOD Bring Your Own Device to work is a concept which has been around for years, but which has recently gained significant ground in the business market, due to the enormous popularity of tablet devices, smart phones and cloud-based services, which have proven their versatility to be beyond that offered by the traditional computer.
 
For businesses, consumerisation offers many benefits, which include a reduced spend on IT hardware, increased productivity and greater employee engagement. However, these short term gains could lead to significant losses if the extent to which BYOD is utilised is not regulated.

For all of the benefits of BYOD, some serious questions hang over its usefulness in the corporate world. Those questions are not simply limited to who owns the hardware and the content, although they are among the most pertinent. One must also question who is responsible for the safety, security and continued operation of personally owned devices, and then also question the extent to which the corporation should, and is indeed allowed
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll