header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009 / Deborah Edwards
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Seeking settlement

Deborah Edwards on how to avoid the pitfalls of Part 36 offers

In April 2009 the “new” rules governing Part 36 offers will have been in practice for two years. The most significant change has been the abolition of the need for parties to physically pay a sum of money into court to show that they were “good for the money”. The new rules allow any party to make a written off er to settle which can be in respect of any issue.

In the overwhelming majority of cases one and sometimes both parties will seek to conclude an action without it proceeding to a full hearing by making a Part 36 offer to settle. Under Part 36, the person who receives a Part 36 offer can accept “at any time” without the permission of the court, not just within a 21-day period but at any time after that and prior to commencement of trial, provided the party accepting the offer pays the other parties costs.

The implications

A claimant can no longer treat a Part 36 offer as the bottom line safety net.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll