header-logo header-logo

29 May 2019 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Seeing the light through the trees

Andrew Francis explains why trees cannot & should not be ignored in right of light claims
  • The effect of trees and large bushes on light can cause a dispute to arise.

It is May, and as Thomas Hardy said ‘the May month flaps its glad green leaves like wings’*. In the cloistered world of rights of light the main concern will usually be the effect of proposed new buildings upon the light enjoyed by its neighbours. But in some cases, particularly as between residential properties, the effect of trees and large bushes on light can cause a dispute to arise. In such cases the High Hedges legislation (Pt 8 of the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003) may assist. This article is not about that remedy. This article is about whether trees and large shrubs etc (referred to generically here as ‘trees’) on the land over which a right of light is claimed (the servient land) should be taken into account when determining whether a proposed building, or structure on the servient land will reduce the light received by the building

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll