header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011 / Elizabeth Cooke , Colin Oakley
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Seeing the light

Elizabeth Cooke & Colin Oakley shed some light on the Law Commission’s project on appurtenant rights

We published our latest report, “Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre” (Law Com No 327) (the Easements Report) last month. It represents a substantial piece of work; our project examined the general law of easements, covenants and profits à prendre (“profits”), how they come into being, and how they come to an end. This article looks at the genesis of that project, and at some new, closely related work that is to be undertaken in the future.

In the beginning

The project was a logical successor to the Commission’s previous work, undertaken with Land Registry, that culminated in the Land Registration Act 2002. With the registration of title wrapped up, it made sense to look in detail at appurtenant interests in land. So there is a focus on registration in the Easements Report, and indeed some of its recommendations relate only to registered title. Of those, the most important relates to the “unity of seisin” rule: the rule that easements and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll