header-logo header-logo

01 November 2013 / Stephen Smith
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Seeing clearly

istock_000001015637medium

Stephen Smith warns practitioners to keep an eye on the tax consequences of disposals set aside under s 37 of MCA 1973

The case of AC v DC (No 1) [2012] EWHC 2032 (Fam), [2012] All ER (D) 380 and AC v DC (No 2) [2012] EWHC 2420 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 11 (Apr) has been subject to comment, in various guises, over the past few months (see “Scuppering unscrupulous spouses”, NLJ, 7 June 2013, p 14).

What is perhaps interesting is that while the judgments by Mostyn J (No 1) and Sir Hugh Bennett (No 2) have attracted comment, there has been little discussion or consideration of the helpful tax analysis undertaken by Mostyn J in AC v DC (No 1) and clarification of the tax consequences arising from the setting aside of a disposition following an application under s 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973).

The final hearing, (No 2), came before Sir Hugh Bennett in the summer of 2012 and dealt with a number of issues, including pre-acquired

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll