header-logo header-logo

Securities litigation: where are we now?

194047
Compared to other jurisdictions, the UK has been slow to develop a route map for commencing & managing securities claims. Christian Tuddenham & Clare Hennessey explain why
  • An overview of the claims that can be brought by disgruntled investors under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
  • The current status of jurisprudence and procedure in relation to these claims and future claims.

Securities litigation generally refers to claims brought by shareholders against listed companies, seeking to recover losses suffered due to a fall in the price of their shares, usually in the wake of allegations of mismanagement or wrongdoing and often against a backdrop of regulatory action.

These kinds of claims are seen relatively frequently in other jurisdictions including, notably, the US and Australia, but despite the availability of statutory redress, they have been slower to take off in the UK.

What claims can be brought?

The primary mechanism for claims in respect of publicly traded securities is statutory—pursuant to ss 90 and 90A of and Sch 10A to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll