header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017 / Kathryn Purkis , Kathryn Purkis
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Section 22 & recovery proceedings

Kathryn Purkis analyses the limitation periods applicable to claims brought by personal representatives

  • On a proper view, s 22 of the Limitation Act 1980 cannot be used to argue that personal representatives have a special 12-year limitation period within which to sue for mistaken overpayments.

An executrix, Hanna, believes she is dealing with a very large estate, with complex assets. A deserving close family member and residual beneficiary, Peter, asks early on in the administration for a distribution of a sum that appears to the executrix to be a small proportion of his ultimate entitlement under the will. The distribution is readily made out of cash. After a while, however, it begins to become apparent to Hanna that all is not well with the testator’s investments: they include a going concern which carries significant liabilities. Worse, there are some very large specific legacies, the payment of which will take priority over any entitlement to residue. Her heart begins to sink. She writes a warning letter to Peter indicating she may need to seek recovery from him, but he ignores it and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll