header-logo header-logo

22 April 2010 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7414 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Secret agents

Charles Pigott predicts more uncertainty for agency workers

In order to be protected by the employment-related discrimination legislation, it is normally necessary to be in a contractual relationship with the proposed respondent. The conventional view has been that the contract worker provisions that are present in all the major anti-discrimination legislation create an exception from this rule for agency workers. Contract work is defined (for example in s 7(1) Race Relations Act 1976 (RRA 1976)) as: “any work for a person (the principal) which is available for doing by individuals (contract workers) who are not employed by the principal himself but by another person, who supplies them under a contract made with the principal.”

Where agency workers are involved, the principal will be the person to whom their labour is supplied and the employment agency will be the “other person” who supplies them. The contract worker provisions then go on to provide for a principal to be liable for acts of discrimination against contract workers, in much the same way as if it had entered into a direct contractual relationship with them.

In most cases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll