header-logo header-logo

22 April 2010 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7414 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Secret agents

Charles Pigott predicts more uncertainty for agency workers

In order to be protected by the employment-related discrimination legislation, it is normally necessary to be in a contractual relationship with the proposed respondent. The conventional view has been that the contract worker provisions that are present in all the major anti-discrimination legislation create an exception from this rule for agency workers. Contract work is defined (for example in s 7(1) Race Relations Act 1976 (RRA 1976)) as: “any work for a person (the principal) which is available for doing by individuals (contract workers) who are not employed by the principal himself but by another person, who supplies them under a contract made with the principal.”

Where agency workers are involved, the principal will be the person to whom their labour is supplied and the employment agency will be the “other person” who supplies them. The contract worker provisions then go on to provide for a principal to be liable for acts of discrimination against contract workers, in much the same way as if it had entered into a direct contractual relationship with them.

In most cases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll