header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009 / Andrew Stenning
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Searching questions

Are HIPs working for you? asks Andrew Stenning

There have been some calls in the past to scrap HIPs which have been backed by statements such as “it would slow the market down” and “it increases costs involved in buying and selling”.

However, a recent poll has been commissioned with over 175 housing industry professionals, which included mortgage lenders, estate agents and property investors who said that they were in favour of HIPs.

Grant Shapps, shadow housing minister for the conservatives, has in the past been clear about the conservatives’ view on scrapping HIPs.

However, it is also worth mentioning that their view is changing as they recently indicated approval of an exchange ready HIP, we can only conclude that they are now beginning to understand the benefits HIPs bring to the conveyancing process.

It is also worth remembering that the majority of information contained within a HIP was always required during the buying and selling process. The Property Information Questionnaire is the most recent addition to the HIP and adds even further quality to the information contained within the pack. By including all this

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll