header-logo header-logo

09 November 2012 / Colin Munro
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A Scottish divorce?

Colin Munro examines how we arrived at the referendum stage in Scotland and where we go after the vote

In the next two years, voters residing in Scotland will have the responsibility of deciding whether a union that has lasted over 300 years should continue. The alternative will be a (reasonably) amicable but necessarily complex divorce. The holding of a referendum on Scottish independence and some of its terms was the subject of an agreement between the British government and the Scottish administration, signed by the prime minister and Alex Salmond, the Scottish First Minister, in Edinburgh on 15 October.

How has it come to this? The late Donald Dewar and other architects of the Scotland Act 1998 probably expected that parties supporting the union would always be in the majority in the Scottish Parliament, as did indeed come to pass from 1999 to 2011. However, voters may choose for all sorts of reasons, and constitutional questions may not be at the forefront. At the general election in 2011, the Scottish National Party (with 44% of the party list votes) was the most popular

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll