header-logo header-logo

15 August 2018
Issue: 7806 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

School exclusion was unlawful

Schools can no longer rely on an Equality Act exemption to exclude children with disabilities who have ‘a tendency to physically abuse’, following an Upper Tribunal decision.

The ruling, C&C v Governing Body [2018] UKUT 269 (AAC), could potentially affect thousands of schoolchildren with special educational needs.

A 13-year-old boy, L, was excluded for ‘a tendency to physically abuse’ even though his behaviour was linked to his autism. Pupils that fall under this category are usually considered exempt from the protection of the Equality Act 2010 under reg 4(1)(c), which means schools do not need to justify the exclusion.

Allowing L’s parents’ appeal, however, Judge Rowley said the use of the exemption came ‘nowhere near striking a fair balance between the rights of children such as L on the one side and the interests of the community on the other’.

‘Aggressive behaviour is not a choice for children with autism,’ she said. ‘To my mind it is repugnant to define as “criminal or anti-social” the effect of the behaviour of children whose condition (through no fault of their own) manifests itself in particular ways so as to justify treating them differently from children whose condition has other manifestations.’

Polly Sweeney, partner at Irwin Mitchell, which acted for the parents, said: ‘This decision does not mean that schools are prevented from excluding children where it is necessary and proportionate to do so. However, it will ensure all disabled children are afforded the same safeguards, protections and rights under the law regardless of whether their disability gives rise to challenging behaviour.’

A spokesperson for the Department for Education said: ‘We will be carefully considering the judgment and its implications before deciding the next steps.’

Issue: 7806 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll