header-logo header-logo

15 August 2012
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Santander panel fury

Law Society fights bank’s conveyancing panel cull

Santander and the Law Society are in discussion over the bank’s decision to drop hundreds of solicitors from its conveyancing panel.

Last year, Santander introduced a one-off fee of £199 plus an annual £99 compliance fee for solicitors on the panel. In July, however, Santander sent letters to many firms informing them they could no longer remain on the panel because they had not carried out enough conveyancing transactions.

A Law Society spokesperson says the number of solicitors affected could be a few hundred, although neither the Law Society nor Santander would know the exact figures for some weeks as an appeals process is on-going.

Some firms have appealed successfully, while others have been told their removal from the panel was a mistake, he says. Solicitors have expressed annoyance at the fact they paid a renewal fee only to be told a few months later that they had been dropped.

The Law Society has urged all affected firms to appeal, and will meet with Santander representatives shortly to discuss a possible “sustainable solution”.

Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson says: “We retain grave reservations about the methods they are using and are concerned about the effects both on firms and consumers.”

A spokesperson for Santander says: “We continue to manage our conveyancing panel in relation to both quality and activity. Firms which do not meet our expectations are removed from the panel but always have a right of appeal.”

In January, HSBC cut the number of solicitors and conveyancers borrowers could use from several thousand to just 48, but backed down four months later under pressure from the Law Society and other user groups. Customers of the bank complained the decision, which meant they had to pay additional legal fees for HSBC’s part of the transaction, caused delays and increased the risk of house sales falling through.

Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Test Article Upgrade

Test Article Upgrade

"Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit...""There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

NEWS

Family lawyers cite financial disincentives for issuing child protection orders

A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
back-to-top-scroll