header-logo header-logo

15 September 2016 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

The same but different

What should expert witnesses expect post Brexit & Briggs? Mark Solon reports

  • At the moment it is business as usual for experts post-Brexit and Lord Justice Briggs’s final report.
  • However there are many changes on the horizon and lawyers will need to make sure their experts are on track.

Many experts are concerned at the implications of Brexit. The good news is that, for now, it’s business as usual. What we do know however is that there are 43 years of EU legislation to disentangle from UK law and many law firms are delighted to advise clients and businesses on what they should do and expert witnesses may be able to help. Lawyers are treating Brexit as the ultimate sales opportunity to gain more clients and there are hundreds of web pages offering insight for potential clients. The reality is that advice will need to be an ongoing process as negotiations proceed.

I would expect that, post Brexit, the basic court rules here will stay the same, so experts will not need to learn a new rule book. Also, the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll