header-logo header-logo

04 May 2018 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Safeguarding matters

nlj_7791_dobson

Reilly v Sandwell: paying the price for the wrongfulness of non-disclosure. By Nicholas Dobson

  • A headteacher who failed to disclose to her employer her relationship with a convicted child sex offender was fairly dismissed.

A primary school headteacher who failed to inform her governing body of a non-sexual relationship with a convicted child sex offender was found to have been fairly dismissed. So decided the Supreme Court unanimously on 14 March 2018. The case in question was Reilly v Sandwell MBC [2018] UKSC 16, [2018] All ER (D) 82 (Mar) in which Lord Wilson gave the lead judgment. Lords Carnwath, Hughes and Hodge agreed and Lady Hale delivered a concurring decision.

A close friendship

Miss Reilly, the appellant (who prior to her dismissal had had an exemplary disciplinary record) had a close platonic friendship with a Mr Selwood. They bought a property in joint names as an investment and also set up a joint bank account out of which to pay the mortgage instalments. Although they did not live together, the appellant occasionally stayed at the property overnight. One such occasion was 24 February 2009,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll