header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011 / Paul Mcclorry , Matthew Chapman
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Safe trip?

Liability & legionnaires’ disease, by Matthew Chapman & Paul McClorry

Legionnaires’ disease is a rare condition. Litigation arising out of the contraction of legionnaires’ disease is rarer still. Kemp & Kemp has a section devoted to legionella: it contains just two cases (the more recent, a decision from 2006).

In January 2005, guidance was produced by the European Surveillance Scheme for Travel Associated Legionnaires’ Disease (EWGLINET) and the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) on the risks associated with travel and hotel facilities where the use of complex water systems, an abundance of wet leisure facilities and, often, a high turnover of staff can result in legionella growth. EWGLINET published guidance on legionella prevention.

It is not uncommon for an overseas hotelier, faced with a legionnaires’ disease claim brought against a tour operator, to show that reasonable efforts were made to comply with the EWGLINET guidance. In other words, tour operators generally wish—for obvious reasons—to defend legionella cases on the ground that reasonable care and skill was exercised in the maintenance of a hotel’s water supply. Clearly, recourse to a fault-based

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll