header-logo header-logo

14 February 2014 / Kate Harris
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Sad times

Is grief enough to invalidate a will, asks Kate Harris

In December 2013, the High Court handed down judgment in a will dispute case and provided useful guidance as to when a testator’s grief will amount to a lack of testamentary capacity (see Dharamshi & Others v Velji & Others [2013] EWHC 3917 (Ch)).

 

Dramatis personae

The claimants in this case were the blood relatives of the testator and the beneficiaries under his last will dated 25 June 2003 (“the June will”). There were two earlier wills dated 11 April 2003 and 1 May 2003 under which the testator’s wife was the principal beneficiary. In the event of his wife predeceasing him, the April and May wills left the entire estate to his wife’s family, the first to third defendants (“the defendants”). The testator’s wife died on 27 May 2003 and he promptly executed the June will, leaving his entire estate to the claimants.

The claimants invited the court to pronounce in favour of the June will. The defendants disputed the validity of the June will on the ground that the testator lacked testamentary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll