header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 February 2014 / Kate Harris
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Sad times

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Is grief enough to invalidate a will, asks Kate Harris
In December 2013, the High Court handed down judgment in a will dispute case and provided useful guidance as to when a testator’s grief will amount to a lack of testamentary capacity (see Dharamshi & Others v Velji & Others [2013] EWHC 3917 (Ch)).

 

Dramatis personae

The claimants in this case were the blood relatives of the testator and the beneficiaries under his last will dated 25 June 2003 (“the June will”). There were two earlier wills dated 11 April 2003 and 1 May 2003 under which the testator’s wife was the principal beneficiary. In the event of his wife predeceasing him, the April and May wills left the entire estate to his wife’s family, the first to third defendants (“the defendants”). The testator’s wife died on 27 May 2003 and he promptly executed the June will, leaving his entire estate to the claimants.

The claimants invited the court to pronounce in favour of the June will. The defendants disputed the validity of the June will on the ground that the testator lacked testamentary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll