header-logo header-logo

10 May 2007 / Richard Miller
Issue: 7272 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The rush to reform

The government needs to slow down and re-engage with the profession if it wants to satisfy consumers, says Richard Miller

With unexpectedly strong language—“breathtakingly risky”; “short-sighted transitional arrangements”; “catastrophic deterioration in the relationship between suppliers, their representative organisations, and the Legal Services Commission (LSC)”—the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee (CASC), in its report Implementation of the Carter Review of Legal Aid, called on the government last week to abandon plans to introduce fixed and graduated fees in October 2007, to review its long-term proposals for best value tendering and to pilot any reforms it decides to bring in.

October 2007 is due to see the introduction of fixed fees for social welfare law advice and assistance, and “graduated” fees, which are merely a series of fixed fees, for family and immigration work. New proposals have been introduced for police station contracts. A graduated fee scheme for solicitors for crown court work is expected, but formal consultation on the scheme has still not started. We are also still awaiting details of the new mental health fee scheme. Later this month, the LSC will start to accept

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll