header-logo header-logo

03 September 2009 / Ruth Pratt
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Running out of time

Ruth Pratt considers extending time for service of a claim form

Claimants have four months from the date of issue to serve the claim form (six months if serving out of the jurisdiction).

Time for service can be extended on application: if made within the time limit, under CPR 7.6(2); if made outside the time limit, under CPR 7.6(3). CPR 7.6(3) provides a threshold checklist of conditions which must be satisfied before the court can order an extension. The court may make such an order only if—(i) the court has failed to serve the claim form; or (ii) the claimant has taken all reasonable steps to comply with R 7.5 but has been unable to do so; and (iii) in either case, the claimant has acted promptly in making the application.

There is no such checklist under CPR 7.6(2).
 

The cases
 

The exercise of the discretion is dependent on the individual facts of each case. The recent first instance decisions in Imperial Cancer, FG Hawkes v Beli Shipping and Sodastream v Coates have all contributed to the development of what

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll