header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Rules of engagement

249524
© Getty images

Mark Pawlowski asks the unromantic question of who keeps the ring, and when, if a couple split

Prior to the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970, a gift of an engagement ring was construed as conditional on the parties’ marriage taking place. In Jacobs v Davis [1917] 2 KB 532, for example, an action was brought to recover a diamond ring given by the plaintiff to the defendant on their engagement. Subsequently, the engagement was broken off. Mr Justice Shearman held that when an engagement ring was given by a man to a woman, there was an implied condition that the ring should be returned if the engagement was broken off. The judge stated, at p533:

‘Though the origin of the engagement ring has been forgotten, it still retains its character of a pledge or something to bind the bargain or contract to marry, and it is given on the understanding that a party who breaks the contract must return it. Whether the ring is a pledge or a conditional gift, the result is the same.’

In Cohen v Sellar

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll