header-logo header-logo

Rules of engagement

18 January 2013 / Janette Porteous
Issue: 7544 / Categories: Features , Family , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Janette Porteous considers whether same-sex marriage will cause a split between the Church & state

Under current legislation a marriage can only be between couples of the opposite sex. Indeed s 11(c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 provides that a marriage is void if the parties are not respectively male and female. The definition of marriage is grounded in the beliefs of the Church of England as expressed in the Book of Common Prayer of 1662 as follows: “The only kind of marriage which English law recognises is one which is essentially the voluntary union for life of one man and with one woman, to the exclusion of all others.”

This definition of marriage was affirmed by Lord Penzance in Hyde v Hyde and Woodhouse (1866) LR 1 P&D 130 and in subsequent cases.

While same-sex couples can enter into civil partnerships by virtue of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (which allows same sex couples to register their relationship and thereby, upon registration, acquire similar rights to married persons, especially on relationship breakdown), they cannot legally marry. The government, at the time

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll