header-logo header-logo

18 January 2013 / Janette Porteous
Issue: 7544 / Categories: Features , Family , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Rules of engagement

Janette Porteous considers whether same-sex marriage will cause a split between the Church & state

Under current legislation a marriage can only be between couples of the opposite sex. Indeed s 11(c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 provides that a marriage is void if the parties are not respectively male and female. The definition of marriage is grounded in the beliefs of the Church of England as expressed in the Book of Common Prayer of 1662 as follows: “The only kind of marriage which English law recognises is one which is essentially the voluntary union for life of one man and with one woman, to the exclusion of all others.”

This definition of marriage was affirmed by Lord Penzance in Hyde v Hyde and Woodhouse (1866) LR 1 P&D 130 and in subsequent cases.

While same-sex couples can enter into civil partnerships by virtue of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (which allows same sex couples to register their relationship and thereby, upon registration, acquire similar rights to married persons, especially on relationship breakdown), they cannot legally marry. The government, at the time

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll