header-logo header-logo

19 February 2010 / David Lock
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Rules of disclosure

David Lock examines the effect on confidentiality in care proceedings following the judgment in Ward

The number of child protection proceedings has risen sharply in the light of the Baby Peter case. At the same time there have been increased calls for greater transparency in family proceedings and demands from parents and others to be allowed to speak about events behind the closed doors of the family courts. However both the rules and the general understanding of the rules by the medical and legal professions has to date made it very difficult for those caught up in family proceedings to explain what has gone on behind closed doors.

However there is a wind of change in the air. In Ward [2010] EWCH 16 (Fam), which was one of his last judgments before assuming his role as chairman of the Law Commission, Lord Justice Munby has rewritten the rules around the confidentiality of family proceedings and used the European Convention on Human Rights to open the way for much greater disclosure of the inner workings of the family courts.

Care proceedings

The facts in Ward

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll