header-logo header-logo

19 February 2010 / David Lock
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Rules of disclosure

David Lock examines the effect on confidentiality in care proceedings following the judgment in Ward

The number of child protection proceedings has risen sharply in the light of the Baby Peter case. At the same time there have been increased calls for greater transparency in family proceedings and demands from parents and others to be allowed to speak about events behind the closed doors of the family courts. However both the rules and the general understanding of the rules by the medical and legal professions has to date made it very difficult for those caught up in family proceedings to explain what has gone on behind closed doors.

However there is a wind of change in the air. In Ward [2010] EWCH 16 (Fam), which was one of his last judgments before assuming his role as chairman of the Law Commission, Lord Justice Munby has rewritten the rules around the confidentiality of family proceedings and used the European Convention on Human Rights to open the way for much greater disclosure of the inner workings of the family courts.

Care proceedings

The facts in Ward

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll