header-logo header-logo

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Rule of law
printer mail-detail

Rule of law concerns

MPs have passed the controversial Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill despite concerns expressed by lawyers

The Bill was brought to circumvent the Supreme Court’s ruling that a government scheme to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful as it is not a safe third country.

Nick Vineall KC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The Bill contains some striking provisions.

‘Section 2(1) requires every decision maker (including the courts) to “conclusively” treat the Republic of Rwanda as a safe country, whether or not it is in fact safe. Section 3 disapplies some key provisions of the Human Rights Act. Happily, s 4 retains the right of the courts to consider whether Rwanda is a safe country for any particular individual.’

Vineall predicted legal challenges if the bill passed into law.

Law Society chief executive officer Ian Jeffery said the bill would create a statutory duty that every decision maker must treat Rwanda as a safe country. Jeffery said parliament ‘cannot use law to change fact’.

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Rule of law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll