header-logo header-logo

06 March 2013
Issue: 7551 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

RTA portal: the latest

Justice secretary sets dates & confirms cuts

Fixed costs for road traffic accident (RTA) portal cases are to be reduced at the end of April, while the expansions to the portal scheme will take place in July, Justice Secretary Chris Grayling has confirmed.

As well as reducing fixed costs, the reforms include expanding the RTA portal scheme to claims for up to £25,000, and extending it to employers’ liability and public liability claims.

Fixed costs for claims below £10,000 will be cut from between £400–£1,200 to between £200–£500.

Claimant solicitors will be able to recover fixed costs of £200-£800 for claims valued at between £10,000–£25,000, £300–£900 for employers’ and public liability claims up to £10,000, and £300–£1,600 for employers’ and public liability claims up to £25,000.

Last week, the High Court rejected an attempt by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) and the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) to bring a judicial review against the decision to cut fixed costs.

APIL and MASS argued the decision was unfair because the government consulted insurers but not claimant lawyers and those representing victims when it reached its decision.

However, Lord Justice Elias said it was not the government’s duty to give equal weight to both sides.

“If people deem it to be unfair that is a matter for the ballot box not the court,” he said.

Rod Evans, president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers, said: “It is pleasing to have a decision that ends the hiatus which has gripped the industry.”

However, MASS and APIL said in a joint statement: “This is a dark day for people who are injured through no fault of their own.”

They warned that injury victims may now find it “impossible to obtain independent legal representation” as a result of the judgment, and that negotiations would “inevitably be biased in favour of insurers”.

According to a Ministry of Justice impact assessment published last week, claimant personal injury lawyers will lose £200m per year when reductions to fixed recoverable costs for RTA portal claims up to £10,000 are introduced.

It stated that if caseloads remained at existing levels then claimant solicitors would lose about £200m in income, as well as “possible” loss of income from lower conditional fee agreement fees. It said the savings to insurers could be passed on to consumers through lower premiums.

About 750,000 claims valued at £10,000 or less were made last year, accounting for 90% of RTA claims.

Issue: 7551 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll