header-logo header-logo

22 June 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The root of the problem

Michael Tringham highlights some misgivings in the recording of vital events to date

When the General Register Office (GRO) decided to digitise 171 years of vital events—the nation’s births, marriages and deaths recorded by generations of local registrars since 1837 and which probate genealogists and family historians alike depend upon—access to the paper records was to have been maintained until the new, improved indexes were available online.

That promise went the way of all flesh in March 2008, when access to the 6,550 physical ledgers kept at the Family Records Centre in north London, was ended, even though the digitisation project was already running a year late. Since then the half finished £16m project has been cancelled with birth records from 1837 to 1934 and death records from 1837 to 1957 still missing. The Identity & Passport Service, which is now responsible for the GRO, say they will “continue to work towards creation of an accessible online index”—but without publishing a timetable.

Meanwhile the GRO shows that it can move quickly enough when you pay them. To combat a fraud known as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll