header-logo header-logo

07 February 2014 / Winston Jacob
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Room for argument

web_jacob

There is no satisfactory solution for the determination of costs under s 138(2) of CCA 1984, says Winston Jacob

Section 138 of the County Courts Act 1984 applies to a claim in the county court by a lessor for possession of land on the ground that the lease is forfeit due to rent arrears. Section 138(2) states: “If the lessee pays into court or to the lessor not less than five clear days before the return day all the rent in arrear and the costs of the action, the action shall cease, and the lessee shall hold the land according to the lease without any new lease.”

A lessee wishing to take advantage of this provision must act swiftly. The return day for these purposes is the first date fixed for the hearing of the claim: Swordheath Properties Ltd v Bolt [1992] 2 EGLR 68. The lessor need only serve the claim 21 days before that hearing (Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) r 55.5(3)), so the lessee may have as little as 16 days from service to make payment.

Crucial

The crucial question is likely

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll