header-logo header-logo

11 November 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Rolling back justice (5)

Jon Robins reflects on the controversial Legal Aid Bill as it makes its way to the House of Lords

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill has had its final reading in the House of Commons. Frankly, there was no shortage of opportunities for MPs to play on the fact that the debate on this “Bill of Horrors” kicked off on All Hallow’s Eve, of all days. However, the Labour MP for Tooting, Sadiq Khan, began with a somewhat prematurely festive image calling the legislation “a Christmas tree Bill” with baubles “being added all the time”.

Festive farce?

The sprawling Legal Aid Bill has 120 clauses and 18 schedules. At the 11th hour—as the Christmas tree was “being cut down to be taken to the other place”, ie the House of Lords—Khan noted that yet “more baubles” were being hung upon its overstretched branches: 17 government new clauses, five new schedules and 84 amendments.

How would MPs do justice to all those huge concerns in the limited time set aside? As Khan noted, there were many important issues

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll