header-logo header-logo

26 March 2010 / Meghann McTague
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Roam to...?

Where has Rome II taken us to in personal injury claims? asks Meghann McTague

The first decision on the application of Rome II came before the UK courts at the end of last year and Mr Justice Owen handed down his judgment last month. In Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB) on 19 December 2007, Mr Clinton Jacobs, a British national who was resident in the UK, was in the car park of a shopping centre in Fuengirola, Spain. He was stood at the rear of his parked vehicle when he was hit by another car and injured.

The other car was being driven by Mr Winfred Bartsch, a German national who was, at the time of the accident, resident in Spain. The vehicle was uninsured.

Had this accident happened in the UK, then the process for recovering damages for personal injury where the tortfeasor was uninsured would have been entirely straightforward; Mr Jacobs would have sought compensation from the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) through its obligation under the Uninsured Drivers’ Agreement of 13 August 1999.

His damages would then have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll