header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Road traffic

[R (on the application of Herron and others) v Parking Adjudicator [2011] EWCA Civ 905, [2011] All ER (D) 253 (Jul)

Regulation 4 of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002, SI 2002/3113, did not require that every part of every street was signed in the manner it specified. The fact that there were road signs regulating parking, and in particular those at pedestrian crossings, that were not referred to in reg 4 rendered it impossible to read it as requiring the specified signage in every part of every road.

Even where a statute was clear in imposing a duty, and did so in terms that were apparently mandatory, it would not necessarily be interpreted as invalidating steps taken by a public authority that were not in strict conformity with the duty. A controlled parking zone (CPZ) was to be treated as valid unless it could be said that in substance, because of the failure adequately to inform the road user, it could not be considered to be a valid CPZ.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll