header-logo header-logo

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Road traffic

Vehicle & Operator Services Agency v Wright [2011] EWHC 1389 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 09 (Jun)

Council Regulation (EC) No. 561/2006 (on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport) clearly mandated the recording of the full extent of all driving of all vehicles to which the regulations applied and then controlled the extent to which that driving might take place. The concept of free disposal of time did not negate the provisions of the regulations in relation to the recording of all driving of vehicles to which the regulations applied and which would undermine the rest required. The Transport Act 1968 applied to any person who was driving in the course of employment or business. It was not seeking to define what type of driving was covered by the Act. It did not provide that references to driving were to driving in the course of employment or business but references to driving by any person were references to “his driving as aforesaid”.

The 2006 regulation was directly effective in domestic law unless there were any express exceptions. Domestic law made no provision for a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll