header-logo header-logo

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Road traffic

Vehicle & Operator Services Agency v Wright [2011] EWHC 1389 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 09 (Jun)

Council Regulation (EC) No. 561/2006 (on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport) clearly mandated the recording of the full extent of all driving of all vehicles to which the regulations applied and then controlled the extent to which that driving might take place. The concept of free disposal of time did not negate the provisions of the regulations in relation to the recording of all driving of vehicles to which the regulations applied and which would undermine the rest required. The Transport Act 1968 applied to any person who was driving in the course of employment or business. It was not seeking to define what type of driving was covered by the Act. It did not provide that references to driving were to driving in the course of employment or business but references to driving by any person were references to “his driving as aforesaid”.

The 2006 regulation was directly effective in domestic law unless there were any express exceptions. Domestic law made no provision for a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll