header-logo header-logo

Road kill

28 June 2007 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Alec Samuels questions whether the new offence of death by careless driving will improve safety and justice on the roads

Everybody knows the problem. There are over 3,000 deaths a year on our roads in “accidents”. By a piece of “unfortunate” driving the driver (D) caused the death of the victim (V), who might be a child. There was not enough evidence to prove dangerous driving and causing death by dangerous driving, so D was prosecuted for careless driving, convicted, and fined—custody not being available. The bereaved family was outraged.
Now, courtesy of the Road Safety Act 2006 (RSA 2006), s 20(1), we have the new offence of causing death by careless driving, with a maximum of one year’s imprisonment and/or a level 5 fine in magistrates’ courts,  and five years’ imprisonment in crown courts:

“A person who causes the death of another person by driving a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, is guilty of an offence.”

PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS

There has long been a philosophical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

back-to-top-scroll