header-logo header-logo

Road kill

28 June 2007 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Alec Samuels questions whether the new offence of death by careless driving will improve safety and justice on the roads

Everybody knows the problem. There are over 3,000 deaths a year on our roads in “accidents”. By a piece of “unfortunate” driving the driver (D) caused the death of the victim (V), who might be a child. There was not enough evidence to prove dangerous driving and causing death by dangerous driving, so D was prosecuted for careless driving, convicted, and fined—custody not being available. The bereaved family was outraged.
Now, courtesy of the Road Safety Act 2006 (RSA 2006), s 20(1), we have the new offence of causing death by careless driving, with a maximum of one year’s imprisonment and/or a level 5 fine in magistrates’ courts,  and five years’ imprisonment in crown courts:

“A person who causes the death of another person by driving a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, is guilty of an offence.”

PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS

There has long been a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll