header-logo header-logo

07 August 2009 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Risky business

Dr Nicholas Dobson provides an update on local authority “wellbeing”

Back in 1903 a group of local authorities got together to form a company called Municipal Mutual Limited (MML) with a view to obtaining insurance on a mutual basis. In September 1992, however, MML ceased to write new business after making substantial losses.

A similar endeavour some 104 years after MML’s birth was to have a much shorter life.

For on 1 April 2007 it might have looked like the spirit of MML was rising from the grave when a company formed by various London boroughs to provide insurance for their corporate property, terrorism, and liability risks commenced operations. But these were to come to an abrupt halt on 9 June 2009 when the Court of Appeal decided that local authorities could not lawfully participate in a mutual insurance company.

At the same time the court found that there had been a breach of procurement rules (the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 implementing Directive 2004/18/EC) when London Borough of Brent (Brent) awarded contracts of insurance to that company.

The body in question was London Authorities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll