header-logo header-logo

01 May 2015 / Catherine Leech
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The ripple effect

nlj_may_1_leech

Catherine Leech reflects on the impact of Woodland on liability & arguments for a non-delegable duty of care

The recent judgment of Mr Justice Blake (handed down 13 February 2015) in the case of Woodland v Maxwell and another [2015] EWHC 273 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 162 (Feb) reinforces the importance of this case as a truly landmark case following the decision in 2013 of the Supreme Court in the same matter ([2013] UKSC 66, [2014] 1 All ER 482).

Annie Woodland was with other children from Whitmore Junior School on 5 July 2000 with the advanced group having swimming lessons in the main pool at Gloucester Park, Basildon. She was 10 years old and the other members of her group were a similar age. Annie suffered a cardiac arrest and brain injury caused through lack of oxygen as a result of a near drowning episode which was not spotted quickly by the swimming teacher for her group nor the lifeguard on duty.

The recent trial before Blake J was on the issue of liability and causation as it had not been accepted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll