header-logo header-logo

04 May 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Rights of passage

nlj_7791_aamodt

Athelstane Aamodt unravels the history of the UK passport

Passports have been in the news a great deal recently. The government's decision to award the contract for the printing of the UK's post-Brexit passports to a Franco-Dutch company Gemalto, and not to the British (but French-sounding) company De La Rue, has taken up many column inches, as has the furore that has resulted from the Home Office's mishandling of the immigration status of the ‘Windrush generation’.

We use passports all the time, not only to travel but to open bank accounts and generally to prove to people that we are whom we say we are. But what are passports? And how long have we been using them? And is it really true that the Queen doesn't have one?

Nationality and identity

A passport is simply a document issued by a country that certifies the nationality and identity of its holder (assuming that you are British, look inside your own passport and you will see that it asks—but does not grant—that the bearer is allowed ‘... to pass freely without let or hindrance ...’ and that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll