header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Rights and wrongs

A genuine and comprehensive Bill of Rights is a distant prospect, says Geoffrey Bindman

A Bill of Rights is a constitutional document setting out the rights which every citizen is entitled to expect its government to guarantee. Britain has had Bills of Rights in the past. Magna Carta is one example; and in 1688 Parliament drew up a Bill of Rights which limited and defined the power of the monarchy and established Parliamentary sovereignty. The value of a Bill of Rights is in its overriding authority and general acceptance but it need not be, and has not been in Britain, binding on Parliament. That is why we say we do not have a “written constitution”, unlike many other countries, including the USA, where legislation must conform to the constitution or be invalidated.

When the UK signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950—it was largely the brainchild of British lawyers—it could be claimed that it had adopted the convention as its Bill of Rights. However, even after 1966, when individuals were enabled to claim violations of the convention at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll