header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Rights and wrongs

A genuine and comprehensive Bill of Rights is a distant prospect, says Geoffrey Bindman

A Bill of Rights is a constitutional document setting out the rights which every citizen is entitled to expect its government to guarantee. Britain has had Bills of Rights in the past. Magna Carta is one example; and in 1688 Parliament drew up a Bill of Rights which limited and defined the power of the monarchy and established Parliamentary sovereignty. The value of a Bill of Rights is in its overriding authority and general acceptance but it need not be, and has not been in Britain, binding on Parliament. That is why we say we do not have a “written constitution”, unlike many other countries, including the USA, where legislation must conform to the constitution or be invalidated.

When the UK signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950—it was largely the brainchild of British lawyers—it could be claimed that it had adopted the convention as its Bill of Rights. However, even after 1966, when individuals were enabled to claim violations of the convention at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll