header-logo header-logo

Righting a housing wrong

08 May 2008 / Francis Davey
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Features , Local government , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Are tolerated trespassers about to get back their homes? Francis Davey reports

As those involved in social housing will know, many former council tenants are, or risk becoming, “tolerated trespassers”— a highly unsatisfactory legal status created by the House of Lords in Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 4 All ER 577, [1996] 1 WLR 1448. The problem stems from the fact that once an order for possession takes effect, the tenancy ends and the former tenant will be a trespasser in their home. Particularly in the context of social housing, such “tenants” may be permitted to remain—either by order of the court or by the forbearance of their landlord—for considerable periods of time after that; in some cases many years.

The Problem

The consequences for a tolerated trespasser are serious. They have no right to bring a claim for disrepair (or any other breach of covenant) against their landlord. Where the tenancy came with rights of succession: those will be lost. A former secure tenant who has become a tolerated trespasser will have no right to buy.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll