header-logo header-logo

06 January 2010
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Features , In-House , Profession , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

The rightful owners

Jo Lloyd-Davies gives an overview of the intellectual property issues involved in finding new suppliers

Manufacturers often buy components from third parties. In economically healthier times, order books were full and outsourcing allowed manufacturers to free space within their factories.

As the manufacturing industry matured, competition within it increased and costs could be saved by buying from suppliers that served many companies within the same sector.

With economic health came complacency. Forecasted high volumes demanded that deals were done quickly; supplier drawings were e-mailed to manufacturers for approval, often without a supporting non-disclosure agreement or supply agreement in place.

Manufacturers are now looking to buy components from cheaper sources or to bring their manufacture in-house. Times are gloomier and such moves are desirable both to save costs and to reduce the potential impact of supplier insolvency.

Buying teams must cut costs but are often unfamiliar with the intellectual property issues involved. This is unsurprising given the myriad registered and unregistered rights which can co-exist.

Registered rights

If the supplier owns a patent or registered design, they have a monopoly right to use that design

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll