header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

The Right to choose not to

Should employees be punished for standing up for their views? Juliet Carp reports

Employees complain about all sorts of things: hours, clothes, food, customers, even colleagues with a different background, lifestyle or opinion. Generally, an employee must comply with his employer's instructions. If the employee refuses to do so, his employer might find a way to accommodate him. If this is impractical, or the employer is unwilling to help, it could respond by instigating disciplinary proceedings, leading to a warning or dismissal. Less formal reactions from managers or colleague might include verbal abuse, a smaller bonus or a lost promotion. The employment protection available to objectors depends on the work they are expected to do, the reasons for objection and the employer’s response. Andrew McClintock, a justice of the peace who objected to the possibility that he might be required to place children with same sex couples, claimed that he had been discriminated against contrary to the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief ) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660) (the regulations). On 31 October the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in McClintock v Department

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll