header-logo header-logo

16 December 2016 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

The right to be heard

nlj_7727_thompson

Peter Thompson QC contends that setting aside a default judgment should be a free service

The right to be heard. It is older than the Human Rights Act and older than the Convention. It goes back to the days when lawyers spoke Latin: audi alteram partem. It is one of the twin pillars of natural justice that are now incorporated in Art 6 of the Convention and in our black letter law: “In the determination of his civil rights…everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.”

So what about court fees? Should the right to a fair and public hearing mean that access to the courts and tribunals should be free at the point of use, like other public services? This is the case in the social security and child support tribunals; and the recent introduction of hefty fees for access to the employment tribunals as well as a major hike in court fees has been sharply criticised in Parliament by the Justice Committee as effectively

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll