header-logo header-logo

16 December 2016 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

The right to be heard

nlj_7727_thompson

Peter Thompson QC contends that setting aside a default judgment should be a free service

The right to be heard. It is older than the Human Rights Act and older than the Convention. It goes back to the days when lawyers spoke Latin: audi alteram partem. It is one of the twin pillars of natural justice that are now incorporated in Art 6 of the Convention and in our black letter law: “In the determination of his civil rights…everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.”

So what about court fees? Should the right to a fair and public hearing mean that access to the courts and tribunals should be free at the point of use, like other public services? This is the case in the social security and child support tribunals; and the recent introduction of hefty fees for access to the employment tribunals as well as a major hike in court fees has been sharply criticised in Parliament by the Justice Committee as effectively

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll