header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / Tony Walton
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Revolutionary road

Tony Walton charts the milestones on the road to fixing fees

Ten short years ago, the Civil Procedure Rules introduced “proportionality” into the relationship between damages and costs. The hourly rate though, continued to rule largely unabated; the perversity that the longer the lawyer took to complete a claim, the more he got paid, remained.

But then the Fixed Recoverable Costs Scheme (“predictable costs”) followed. Something of a quiet revolution, it introduced fixed fees into motor claims settling up to £10,000 outside proceedings—the vast majority of such claims. It’s a revolution which has succeeded in deposing the hourly rate from the majority of those claims.

If all goes to plan, the next stage of the revolution begins next April. Assuming the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ’s) recently published recommendations for costs in road traffic accidents (RTAs) are implemented, a new regime of much reduced staged fees will apply to the same category of claims-injuries worth up to £10,000 arising from RTAs settling before issue of proceedings.

Innovation

The MoJ proposals are innovative in procedure as well:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll