header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / Tony Walton
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Revolutionary road

Tony Walton charts the milestones on the road to fixing fees

Ten short years ago, the Civil Procedure Rules introduced “proportionality” into the relationship between damages and costs. The hourly rate though, continued to rule largely unabated; the perversity that the longer the lawyer took to complete a claim, the more he got paid, remained.

But then the Fixed Recoverable Costs Scheme (“predictable costs”) followed. Something of a quiet revolution, it introduced fixed fees into motor claims settling up to £10,000 outside proceedings—the vast majority of such claims. It’s a revolution which has succeeded in deposing the hourly rate from the majority of those claims.

If all goes to plan, the next stage of the revolution begins next April. Assuming the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ’s) recently published recommendations for costs in road traffic accidents (RTAs) are implemented, a new regime of much reduced staged fees will apply to the same category of claims-injuries worth up to £10,000 arising from RTAs settling before issue of proceedings.

Innovation

The MoJ proposals are innovative in procedure as well:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll